Fingerjig - Exercise for a Geek!

Any touch-typists around? If so you may want to test your skills by going here:

http://www.jonmiles.co.uk/fingerjig.php

Fingerjig is a fast paced 6 minute game, that will test your typing skills. The first level is easy but it starts getting real tough as you go along. Even in the second level, the words are really long and many of them I had not heard of before so it took me a little longer to type them. My scores not much to write home about so I’ll avoid publishing it, but I will be interested in seeing who gets high scores!

Have fun!

Cheers…Kishore

RSS feed

5 Comments »

Comment by Gaurav
2007-06-06 15:45:48

462838 … nowhere close to the top! whats your score?

Comment by Kishore
2007-06-06 16:23:49

I got as fast as 30 wpm, and then gave up! ;-)

Cheers…Kishore

 
 
Comment by KB
2007-06-07 07:14:37

A dyslexic’s nightmare!!! I’m capable of typing up to 70 wpm, and never topped 50 in this game. The letters flying at you as you type them mixed me up because my brain would see them instead of the ones I was supposed to typing, and with the words bouncing up and down, I’d lose my place and have to wait until the screen cleared to figure out which letter I was on! Annoyances that I think make the wpm count inaccurate in the end, but still a fun little game!

 
Comment by Rajesh
2007-06-13 09:58:10

I tried, I failed then… will try again. I went to learn typing formally, there has to be some use of it…:).

R

 
Comment by SCOOBY-DOO
2007-11-28 23:53:39

you guys are quiters !!!!!!!!! im a BEAST AT TYPING!!!!!!! if you keep going and going going you will type fast!!!!!!! i got up too like 64wpm . and it feels great!!!!!!! so get it together and type!!!!!!!! {by the way it took me like 15 seconds to type this } =]

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.